From 8 August 2023 UBS’ Lawyers’ relentless attempts to silence justice.

Good time of the day dear friends and supporters,

All the efforts of the bank’s lawyers could be considered a good subject for a feuilleton, but alas, this is happening in real life, and as long as there is no court favorable decision, it is dangerous enough.

Of course, they do not care about the economy of justice – to save time and costs, oh no, their main goal is still the same all eight years – to try to silence us.

Obviously, such concepts as honor, decency, professional cleanliness are not known to them, and perhaps all this activity helps them drown out their own conscience.

So, this week on the one hand they have resumed their attempt to obtain a date for taxation (payment of cost) in the Court of Appeal, which is technically possible, but since our two decisions on special leave of appeal are in the Privy Council, and until a decision is made, there to do taxation, since the case is not yet completed.

Not to mention, if we are successful, which we believe in and really hope that we will finally have an opportunity to defend ourselves, then UBS will pay us the costs.

On another hand UBS’ lawyers wrote to the judge in the Supreme Court,  with a semi-complaint against us that we were not responding to their request for a signature of the court’s order, and not embarrassingly pointing out that we were asking for some documents. well, yes, and it is for 6 years already – documents that are included in their own List of Disclosures of 31 August 2018 and which relate to our trades on the NYSE in 2013, for which UBS has falsified records in 2018 and have not yet provided with any proof that our orders was ever sent to NYSE.

In parallel, other lawyers from the same firms who defended the Credit Suisse, also distinguished themselves in the style of a feuilleton or a slap in the face of the Judiciary, since they themselves participated in the development of the new court rules. But that didn’t stop them from putting forward a Bill of Cost, while application fro leave to appeal or re-open the case for lack of reasoning will be heard on 6 September, and for the amount which exceeds only 285 times the limit set by the new Rules of the Supreme Court of the Bahamas.


Yes, after such a week you re-read Johnathan Swift’s words and think how “stable” our world is and how little of it has changed.

But there is good news, there are other lawyers who remember what conscience, dignity, equity and justice are – signor attorney Mr. Philip Lundy, signor attorney, former Magistrate Mrs.Yvette McCartney-Meredith, thanks again to them. Thanks to our many supporters, experts who with their drops of wisdom indicate to us steps and documents to use.

And, of course, there are many more of them, and we really hope to meet one day our Daredevil, which will help to bring our case to its deserved victory in the USA where our case also reached to an absurd point.

I wish you all not to lose optimism and go forward.

We appreciate you sharing this article. Please sign and share our petition if you haven’t already, and help us reach our goal of getting more subscriptions.


Irina

One comment

  1. […] before the Privy Council and a trial to be scheduled in the Supreme Court. On the other hand, Credit Suisse lawyers had a “math problem” and are also seeking taxation for an amount that exceeds only 285 times what is allowed by the […]

    Like

Leave a comment